Salon has an article about “How Mark Twain became Mark Twain: The amazing story of the lectures that made him a superstar,” which we might have called “How Mark Twain was a 19th-Century Professor Awesome.” Think we could get him to do a guest post here?
When the news broke that J.R.R. Tolkienâ€™s translation of Beowulf would finally be published this May, fans of Tolkienâ€™s fantasy joined scholars of medieval literature in rejoicing. There had been rumors for years that it might soon be published since its rediscovery in 2003, but as the years passed, rumor threatened to become myth. Nearly 90 years had passed since Tolkien translated it, and given his estateâ€™s tight grip on his documents, it seemed that the translation might never be published — and now, over four decades after his death, Tolkien fans will have a new piece of his work to enjoy.
It might be easy to categorize this along with other posthumous finds — such as the recent discovery of lost poems by Douglas Adams or lost recordings by the Beatles. The joy is like finding money you had forgotten about in a jacket pocket; it feels like a gift of something youâ€™ve always had, and is in some way all the sweeter for it.
Unlike those other finds, though, this one is IMPORTANT. I do not wish to diminish the joy in finding a new Adams poem, but realistically very little will change about the way we understand Adams, the Beatles, or any other art by these finds. In fact, I would argue that is true for most of the other posthumous texts of Tolkien himself, such as The Children of HÃºrin or The Legend of Sigurd and GudrÃºn. These were wonderful to have, but in the grand scheme of things they arenâ€™t particularly important.
Beowulf is different. Although this might be hard to believe in 2014, a century ago the poem was not generally well-regarded. When scholars looked at the poem, they found it to be a poor imitation of the great classical epics, and mostly interesting for study as a cultural artifact that told us something about Germanic culture, but not really as great literature. Beowulf as a hero was not as interesting as Achilles or Aeneas, he just goes around killing monsters, and at the best it might be a kind of muddled Christian allegory. In other words, the consensus was mostly that it sucked.
Then in 1936, J.R.R. Tolkien came and tore off the arm of the academic world with the publication of his address, â€œBeowulf: The Monsters and the Critics.â€ (You can read it for free here). In a lecture that has Tolkienâ€™s recognizable wit and humor interlaced with deep scholarship, Tolkien argued that the critics were all focusing on the wrong things. Of course Beowulf isnâ€™t a great classical epic; itâ€™s not an epic at all. Instead, it is more akin to the Viking sagas and elegies, so itâ€™s rather like complaining that your watermelon doesnâ€™t have a strong enough banana flavor. And those monsters arenâ€™t some kind of distraction from an examination of the character of the hero Beowulf; they are the point. In many ways, the book is about the monsters more than the hero.
Basically what happened at this point was the entire academic establishment collectively smacked itself on the forehead and said, â€œWell, duh. Why didnâ€™t I think of that?!â€ Beowulf went from being this awkward poem that was too long to ignore even though it might deserve it, to being at the center of Old English literature, even eclipsing Caedmonâ€™s Hymn. Many people have argued that Tolkienâ€™s â€œBeowulf: The Monsters and the Criticsâ€ is the most influential thing ever written about Beowulf, but I would go further; I think Tolkien essentially saved Beowulf. If not for him, the poem might have languished for another century or two. And now, we have a translation of Beowulf that Tolkien did a decade before saving it. In that translation, we will likely be able to see how he grappled with it early on.
Yeah, OK, but how is that important for everyone who isnâ€™t a medieval language nerd? Tolkienâ€™s Beowulf is likely to become the standard translation that students read in high schools and universities, and I suspect that change will happen fast. For many years poet Burton Raffelâ€™s translation ruled, but about a dozen years ago it was replaced by Seamus Heaneyâ€™s translation. And truthfully, Seamus Heaneyâ€™s version became the standard more because of his celebrity than because of the quality of the translation — even versions intended for students (like Edward Risdenâ€™s great translation) canâ€™t quite demand the kind of attention of a Nobel Prize winner, regardless of accuracy.
Why is Tolkienâ€™s Beowulf a contender right out of the gate? First, publisher HarperCollins has the juice to make that happen, not just with big marketing bucks, but also by putting Tolkienâ€™s version in every relevant anthology they make. Second, Tolkien has got the scholarly chops that make it hard to question his translation choices. There will probably be words, phrases, or entire lines that others will quibble over, but it will be the kind of quibbles where people will say, â€œHmmm, I would have done that differently,â€ not â€œHey, thatâ€™s just wrong!â€ Tolkien knew his stuff about language in general, and understood Beowulf like nobody else. This translation starts off backed by a scholarly reputation that even the super-respected Burton Raffel canâ€™t match.
But perhaps the biggest reason is that no one else can match Tolkienâ€™s celebrity. Seriously, can you imagine anything more helpful to a high school teacher than being able to say a text was translated by Tolkien? We will go from this …
Teacher: In this class, weâ€™ll be reading the Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf.
Teacher: Hey, this was translated by Seamus Heaney. You know, the Nobel Prize winning poet who wrote â€œDigging.â€
Student: *pulls out a cell phone and starts texting*
â€¦ to this.
Teacher: In this class, weâ€™ll be reading the Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf.
Teacher: Hey, this was translated by JRR Tolkien. You know, the guy who wrote The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings.
Student: *Looks up from their cell phone suspiciously* Really? Well, whatâ€™s it about? Itâ€™s not going to be like A Separate Peace, is it?
Teacher: Oh, itâ€™s about a guy who goes around fighting sea monsters, trolls, and dragons.
Student: Yeah, but maybe itâ€™s like Crime and Punishment, which start out with an axe murder, but then just turns into a bunch of talking.
Teacher: Nope. Heâ€™s pretty much killing stuff the whole time. And when they arenâ€™t killing stuff, theyâ€™re partying and talking about great battles.
Student: My entire life until this point has been a sham. I now know my true destiny â€¦ to read Beowulf.
My prediction: In the future, young people will mistakenly believe Tolkien wrote Beowulf as his own work of fiction. And I for one look forward to the day when I am regularly correcting that point on my studentsâ€™ papers.
Gameranx lists what they think are the “Top Twelve Best Medieval Games.” What say you all?
The darkest, most complex and nuanced science fiction universe on television today isnâ€™t Doctor Who, Walking Dead, or Helix â€“ itâ€™s an unassuming childrenâ€™s cartoon about a boy and his dog (or perhaps a dog and his boy), Adventure Time. Set in our post-apocalyptic future, the world of Adventure Time is a childlike mix of Dungeons & Dragons with Candy Land. Just looking at still images for the show, you might think it is intended for very young children, but Adventure Time has attracted an obsessive adult fan following. Although it uses many of the common strategies cartoons use for appealing to adult viewers (such as sly adult humor references and large doses of nostalgia), Adventure Timeâ€™s main appeal is that it lovingly depicts contemporary geek culture in a complicated, meta-narrative way, without sacrificing the childlike innocence of the show.
Nostolgia about the gender roles of geek culture is an important part of the mix. To call Adventure Time non-gendered or post-gendered would be wrong â€“ in fact, gender roles are very firmly delineated in the way that they are for middle school age children. Instead, it gleefully plays with those roles. Finn and Jake, the main adventurers, are both adolescent males, while almost every primary female character is a princess of some sort. When not approaching adventure like it is play, Finn and Jake spend much of their time playing video games with their anthropomorphized computer BMO, who looks more like a Mac Classic than a more recent computer. When they watch videos, they use VCRs rather than DVD players. The various princesses spend much of their time building their empires, but generally leave the adventuring to the boys. They are damsels, but they are rarely damsels-in-distress — they are damsels-in-charge. With the exception of the much more adult relationship of Jake and Lady Rainicorn, the drama of their romantic relationships is of the puppy love variety. Life in Adventure Time is a nostalgic view of the proto-geek world that anyone over 30 recognizes from their own childhood.
But Adventure Time doesnâ€™t just dwell in the past; it also embraces contemporary geek culture. The series opened with a zombie-apocalypse episode, and it has had episodes focused on everything from a Magic: The Gathering style card game, to differing views of time travel, to debates about science vs. magic (read: religion). Indeed, there seems to be no type of geekiness that Adventure Time wonâ€™t happily celebrate: Music geeks, film geeks, car geeks, food geeks, Shakespeare geeks â€¦ each depiction seems to be undergirded by one underlying ethic: It doesnâ€™t matter what kind of geek you are, as long as you unabashedly geek out. Fan fiction geekery creates a meta-narrative, as the Ice King writes gender-swapped Mary Sue fan fiction within Adventure Time, about Adventure Time. Rather than disparaging and mocking fan fic, it creates an alternate storyline that adds richness and complexity to the main story.
And that richness and nuance may be the biggest draw of all, because the show rewards fans who dig with geeky obsession. Alternate storylines, alternate universes, past lives, and complexly interwoven plots mean that everything yields to deeper examination. Indeed, Iâ€™ve literally spent hours discussing tiny details from screen captures, allusions to contemporary politics, and the sequences of subplots in relation to one another. The closing episodes of Season 5 were particularly complex, with interwoven time-travel episodes, an episode shot as if the audience were trapped inside a magical orb, and an exploration of Randian Objectivism (seriously). All that tied to gags about â€œBillyâ€™s legendary crack.â€
Adventure Time isnâ€™t simply about geek culture, it is for geek culture. Indeed, Adventure Time fans will probably read this article and argue that Iâ€™ve misrepresented some things: â€œIf itâ€™s not post-gendered, what about the gender-swapping episodes? Or BMO sometimes being presented as male, sometimes as female? Or Finnâ€™s past life as a girl?â€ And they wonâ€™t be wrong to raise those objections, because the show invites us to critique it, to dissect it, and to produce our own fan art and fan fiction. In the end, Adventure Time is more than an object of geek culture â€“ it is an active participant in it.